Definition: For Moses had given the inheritance of two tribes and an half tribe on the other side Jordan: but unto the Levites he gave none inheritance among them.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Joshua 14:3. It’s a really important part of understanding how God worked in the Old Testament and how He chose to bless certain people. Here's what it means in simpler terms: Essentially, this verse tells us that God specifically blessed two tribes of Israel – the Kohలీ and the Dan – with a portion of the land on the opposite side of the Jordan River. Let’s unpack that a bit: “For Moses had given…” : This means Moses was responsible for this blessing. He made a specific arrangement. “…the inheritance of two tribes and an half tribe…” : This is where it gets a little more nuanced. It wasn't just two tribes, but two tribes – the Kohలీ and the Dan – that were given this land. "An half tribe" means there was a small portion left over for the Levites (the priests, scribes, and tax collectors). “…on the other side Jordan…” : This clarifies where the land was located – on the opposite side of the river from Israel. So, what’s the point? This blessing was a special privilege . It wasn't just a general allowance of land; it was specifically reserved for the priests and those who served God in the Levites. It shows that God valued their service and presence in His community. Why is this significant? This story highlights several important themes: God’s Favor: It demonstrates that God has a special way of blessing certain people and places. Responsibility & Service: It emphasizes the importance of those who serve God – like the Levites – in receiving this favor. Divine Arrangement: It shows that God often works in ways that are carefully planned and strategically arranged, rather than randomly distributed. In short, this verse describes a specific blessing given to two tribes of Israel, reserved for their spiritual service, on the opposite side of the Jordan River. --- Do you have any other questions about this verse or would you like me to explain it in a different way? For example, are you curious about its historical context, or perhaps how it relates to the Old Testament story of Joshua and the conquest of Canaan?